GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
OTTAWA
HomeSeismicSoil liquefaction analysis

Soil Liquefaction Analysis in Ottawa: Seismic Ground Assessment

Rigorous testing. Clear reporting.

LEARN MORE

The triaxial cell gets pressurized to replicate the exact effective overburden stress at the target depth, right before we run the cyclic loading stage to measure pore pressure buildup. In Ottawa, this is not a routine checkbox—the Leda clay and deep sand lenses sitting under much of the downtown and the west end behave very differently under earthquake shaking, and a standard SPT refusal does not tell you whether that layer will liquefy and lose all shear strength. We run the analysis following the NBCC seismic hazard values for the Ottawa–Gatineau region, which sits in a moderate seismicity zone with a 2% in 50-year probability of exceedance, and we combine it with CPT testing to get a continuous soil behavior type profile without sample disturbance.

A factor of safety below 1.1 on a sand lens at 6 m depth can mean 40 to 70 mm of post-liquefaction settlement—enough to shear utility connections entering a building.

Our service areas

Scope of work

On sites near the Rideau River floodplain we see clean fine sands that look dense in a split spoon but can still trigger liquefaction if the fines content is below 15% and the cyclic resistance ratio is overestimated. The analysis has to account for the high groundwater table—often less than 2.5 m below grade in spring—and the thin crust of desiccated clay that masks the loose saturated layer underneath. We compute the factor of safety against liquefaction per Youd & Idriss (2001) procedures, adjusting for magnitude scaling factor and overburden correction. For projects where the client needs a site-specific ground motion, we run a seismic microzonation study that ties the liquefaction triggering directly to the shear wave velocity profile and the NBCC uniform hazard spectrum.
Soil Liquefaction Analysis in Ottawa: Seismic Ground Assessment
Technical reference — Ottawa

Area-specific notes

One recurring error we see in Ottawa is treating the stiff upper crust of Champlain Sea clay as a non-liquefiable barrier and skipping the deeper sand units entirely. The clay cap can be 3 to 5 m thick, but below it the sand can be loose and saturated, and when the cyclic loading hits, the excess pore pressure migrates upward and softens the clay interface—the foundation loses bearing capacity from the bottom up. Another mistake is using a single average SPT blow count across a 10 m column; a 1.2 m sand seam with N=6 can govern the whole site response. We have the lab capacity to run cyclic direct simple shear on undisturbed samples retrieved with a fixed-piston sampler, which gives us the actual CRR curve instead of a generic empirical correlation.

Need a geotechnical assessment?

Reply within 24h.

Email: contact@geotechnicalengineering.vip

Watch how it works


Standards used

NBCC 2020 seismic hazard provisions for Ottawa (Sa(0.2), Sa(1.0), Sa(2.0)), ASTM D5311/D5311M-22 (cyclic triaxial) and ASTM D6528-22 (cyclic direct simple shear), NCEER/NSF Youd & Idriss (2001) liquefaction triggering consensus, Ishihara & Yoshimine (1992) post-liquefaction volumetric strain, CSA A23.3-19 seismic design requirements for concrete structures on liquefiable soils

Technical data


ParameterTypical value
Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR)Computed from site-specific PGA and total/effective stress profile
Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR)Derived from SPT (N₁)₆₀cs or CPT qt, corrected for fines content
Factor of Safety (FSL)CSR/CRR ratio; threshold <1.1 indicates liquefaction risk
Lateral Spreading DisplacementEstimated per Youd et al. (2002) empirical model for free-face and gently sloping ground
Post-Liquefaction SettlementVolumetric strain integration per Ishihara & Yoshimine (1992) method
Liquefaction Severity Index (LSI)Depth-weighted factor of safety, used to classify site performance category
Groundwater CorrectionSeasonal high water table mapped for Ottawa sub-watersheds

Common questions

Does Ottawa really need a liquefaction analysis? Earthquakes are rare here.

The NBCC assigns Ottawa a seismic hazard with a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years, which is the design basis for all new buildings. The Western Quebec Seismic Zone has produced magnitude 5.5+ events, and the Leda clay deposits amplify ground motion at long periods while the underlying sand lenses are susceptible to liquefaction. Ignoring it means assuming zero excess pore pressure—an assumption that fails if the peak ground acceleration exceeds 0.08–0.12 g on a sandy site.

How much does a soil liquefaction analysis cost for a typical Ottawa building site?

A full liquefaction assessment, including field investigation, laboratory cyclic testing, and the engineering report with settlement estimates, runs between CA$3,300 and CA$6,530 depending on the number of boreholes, depth of the liquefiable layers, and whether CPT soundings are added to supplement the SPT data.

What is the difference between a liquefaction analysis and a regular bearing capacity study?

A bearing capacity study assumes static loading and intact soil structure. A liquefaction analysis evaluates what happens when earthquake shaking generates excess pore water pressure, reducing effective stress to near zero. The soil can lose 80-95% of its shear strength temporarily, and the foundation can settle or tilt even if the static bearing capacity was adequate. The two analyses must be integrated—not run in isolation.

Location and service area

We serve projects across Ottawa and surrounding areas.

View larger map